ShopDreamUp AI ArtDreamUp
Deviation Actions
I just want to make something clear, and I'm really hoping this isn't too harsh, but we do have quality standards to meet.
Something I've noticed A LOT in recent submissions is that I will reject them for being too out-of-focus or low-resolution, and the people submitting them will tell me that they were edited to look that way/that was the intention. And I don't want to go pretentious art student on you guys, but having taken loads of photography classes, it doesn't really matter what your intention is if it doesn't show through in the end.
But the thing is, even if you do shoot for a blurred photograph, it's very rare we will actually accept it, unless it is SPECTACULAR. We most often only accept photographs in which the cosplayer's face and costume are in focus, because our group aims to showcase cosplays and not to exist as a collection of artistic photographs of cosplayers.
A lot of the photos I reject for being blurry or low-resolution look more like the camera just wasn't focused enough or they were taken on a lower resolution camera probably not designed for professional photography and not like they were edited in Photoshop specifically to look that way. If you want your photos to be artistically/intentionally blurred, make sure you go the whole mile and actually make them blurry, not just barely lacking the crisp quality our group is looking for. I'm not trying to be rude or condescending here, but I and a lot of classmates have struggled with this in photography and it's a common thing. If you want to include something that's commonly considered an error (like blurring) in your photograph, you need to make sure it's prominent and strong enough that it looks like it was intentional and not just a mistake.
This also holds true for other things. Sometimes when we reject photos for appearing candid or being "hall shots" or bedroom shots or whatever else, we get a response contradicting our reason for rejecting the photo. But it doesn't really matter whether or not the photo isn't really what we suspected it was if it still has the appearance of being that kind of photo. There is a certain kind of posing and composition to most of those photographs that isn't exactly what the group is looking for.
And I've noticed a lot of hipster versions of the characters being submitted in selfie style or low-res webcam photos, and I understand that it's part of the context and that was intentional, but it still goes against the group rules, unless the photo is absolutely spectacular. That doesn't mean that your photo isn't good or clever or that your cosplay isn't well-done, it's just against group rules. Though since for these shots I know it's part of the context, if the photo is really good we will still accept it.
Please take these things into consideration when submitting photographs and when your photos get rejected on this principle.
Thanks,
Jazqui
Something I've noticed A LOT in recent submissions is that I will reject them for being too out-of-focus or low-resolution, and the people submitting them will tell me that they were edited to look that way/that was the intention. And I don't want to go pretentious art student on you guys, but having taken loads of photography classes, it doesn't really matter what your intention is if it doesn't show through in the end.
But the thing is, even if you do shoot for a blurred photograph, it's very rare we will actually accept it, unless it is SPECTACULAR. We most often only accept photographs in which the cosplayer's face and costume are in focus, because our group aims to showcase cosplays and not to exist as a collection of artistic photographs of cosplayers.
A lot of the photos I reject for being blurry or low-resolution look more like the camera just wasn't focused enough or they were taken on a lower resolution camera probably not designed for professional photography and not like they were edited in Photoshop specifically to look that way. If you want your photos to be artistically/intentionally blurred, make sure you go the whole mile and actually make them blurry, not just barely lacking the crisp quality our group is looking for. I'm not trying to be rude or condescending here, but I and a lot of classmates have struggled with this in photography and it's a common thing. If you want to include something that's commonly considered an error (like blurring) in your photograph, you need to make sure it's prominent and strong enough that it looks like it was intentional and not just a mistake.
This also holds true for other things. Sometimes when we reject photos for appearing candid or being "hall shots" or bedroom shots or whatever else, we get a response contradicting our reason for rejecting the photo. But it doesn't really matter whether or not the photo isn't really what we suspected it was if it still has the appearance of being that kind of photo. There is a certain kind of posing and composition to most of those photographs that isn't exactly what the group is looking for.
And I've noticed a lot of hipster versions of the characters being submitted in selfie style or low-res webcam photos, and I understand that it's part of the context and that was intentional, but it still goes against the group rules, unless the photo is absolutely spectacular. That doesn't mean that your photo isn't good or clever or that your cosplay isn't well-done, it's just against group rules. Though since for these shots I know it's part of the context, if the photo is really good we will still accept it.
Please take these things into consideration when submitting photographs and when your photos get rejected on this principle.
Thanks,
Jazqui
Slight Change to Rules...Soon
So a couple things that we have mulled over are:
-Some contributors seem to be taken aback that we would tell them why we rejected their submission, as if we were attacking them
-A lot of contributors seem to get defensive to the point of rudeness when we reject their submissions for being low-quality and demand to know how it could possibly be so
-Inaccurate or Very Visibly Low-Quality Costumes (though mostly inaccurate)
-People who submit the same pictures over and over
Our Process of Dealing with Rejected Submissions
A few months ago, we had gotten enough indignant remarks from contributors who did not see their submissions getting acce
Gallery Updates!
ho ho ho
I'm keeping up like I said I would this go around!
And finally, finally making new galleries for characters that have been a long time coming. Like who would have guessed there was so much submissions in the group for Belgium and Netherlands? Not me. Hot damn guys.
So there were some galleries revamped, split up, or just plain new galleries.
Gallery Changes:
• Ancients
• Australia
• Baltics
• Belarus
• Belgium
• Creatures of Hetalia
• Historical Figures
• Hong Kong
• Liechtenstein
• Netherlands
• Non Canon Countries
• Non Canon Outfits
• Po
Change in Group Admin and my Apologies
EDIT: Please also see the previous message that I've usurped XD
Hello all! This is the group admin. I created the group... Oh gosh, years ago? Because a group for Hetalia cosplayers didn't yet exist and I figured this would be a cool medium to do it!
...Then it exploded in popularity and, on my side, real life happened. Specifically my thesis and uni graduation happened. Unfortunately, that meant that this group's been severely neglected. For that, I apologize. I know some of you count on the exposure that a group like this can bring. However, because of this, several of my lovely mods have received nasty personal messages over the past few
Group Back in Action
Submissions
So for the first time in about a year my inbox is at zero. I said something like this in the last update entry I did for this group a year ago. lolz
That being said, you may have noticed if your submissions were rejected yesterday I didn't give any reasons to why it was rejected. I had about 500 messages to go through and I decided for the sake of getting everyone's stuff out into the group gallery I would just speed through it.
About 85% of the reason I don't have time for checking this group is 'cuz we give every single submission a reason to why we're not accepting it. 'Cuz I'm sure everyone would like an answer to why some
Featured in Groups
© 2013 - 2024 Hetalia-Cosplay
Comments2
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Although this is of the wrong fandom, if you want an example of intentional blurring by a professional photographer and such to get a specific shot, this might be what you're looking for to show people?
[link]
But again, it is as you said - it doesn't focus on the cosplay/character at all.
[link]
But again, it is as you said - it doesn't focus on the cosplay/character at all.